AI can write user stories in seconds, but most are disconnected from your codebase. Here's how to generate stories that match your actual code capabilities.
AI assistants write code fast. Your codebase becomes a mess faster. Here's how to maintain control when AI is writing half your code.
Sourcegraph searches code. CodeSee maps architecture. Glue discovers what your codebase actually does — features, health, ownership — and why that matters more.
I gave AI agents proper context for 30 days. The results: 40% faster onboarding, 60% fewer bugs, and tools that actually understand our codebase.
Your legacy code has no docs? Write PRDs backwards from the implementation. Here's how to extract product specs from code that everyone forgot about.
Product managers need code awareness, not more dashboards. Here's what separates winning AI PMs from those drowning in feature backlogs in 2025.
Claude and Copilot fail on real codebases because they lack context. Here's why AI coding tools break down—and what actually works for complex engineering tasks.
AI coding tools promise 10x productivity but deliver 10x confusion instead. The problem isn't the AI—it's the missing context layer your team ignored.
Traditional kanban boards track tickets. AI kanban boards track code, dependencies, and blast radius. Here's why your team needs the upgrade.
Dependency graphs aren't just debugging tools. Smart teams use them to parallelize work, prevent merge conflicts, and cut release cycles by weeks.
Most AI project tools are glorified chatbots. Here's how to actually use AI to understand what's happening in your codebase and ship faster.
The tools you need to ship faster in 2025. From IDE to production, here's what works—and what most teams are missing between code and planning.
You have the perfect requirements template. You still ship the wrong thing. The problem isn't your process—it's that you don't understand your own codebase.
AI coding tools generate code fast but lack context. Here's what actually works in 2026 and why context-aware platforms change everything.
Stop building AI features that hallucinate in production. Context engineering is the difference between demos that wow and systems that ship.
Your engineers ship fast, but nobody uses what they build. Here's why "trust the vibe" development destroys product-market fit.
Shift-left is dead. Modern AI doesn't just catch bugs earlier—it understands your entire codebase at every stage. Here's what shift-everywhere actually means.
Low-code platforms promise speed but deliver technical debt nobody talks about. Here's what the $65B market boom means for engineering teams.
Your team's AI coding tools generate garbage because they're context-blind. Here's why 73% of AI code gets rejected and how context awareness fixes it.
Raw code metrics lie to you. Stop drowning in file-level data. Learn how context intelligence platforms turn code into features, ownership, and strategy.
ClickUp, Monday, and Asana all have AI. None understand your code. Here's what their AI actually does—and what's still missing for engineering teams.
Engineering teams lose 20-35% of developer time to context acquisition. This invisible tax is baked into every estimate and accepted as normal. It shouldn't be.
Why 60+ specialized MCP tools beat generic LLM prompting for code intelligence. Deep dive into the protocol that makes AI actually useful for developers.
AI-generated dev plans with file-level tasks based on actual codebase architecture. How to cut sprint planning overhead by 50%.
Most AI tool adoptions fail to deliver ROI. Here are the productivity patterns that actually work for engineering teams.
CODEOWNERS files are always stale. Git history tells the truth about who actually maintains, reviews, and understands each part of your codebase.
AI-generated prototypes are impressive demos. They're terrible production systems. Here's where vibe coding ends and real engineering begins.
Each context switch costs a developer 23 minutes to regain focus. In a typical day, that adds up to 2-3 hours of lost deep work.
Code reviews catch style issues and obvious errors. They miss the architectural bugs that cause production incidents. Here's why, and how to fix it.
Most teams measure AI tool success by adoption rate. The right metric is whether hard tickets get easier. Here's the framework that works.
How spec drift silently derails engineering teams and how to detect it before you ship the wrong thing.
Remote work broke ambient knowledge sharing. Here's how to rebuild it without forcing everyone back to the office.
AI reshaped the developer tool landscape. Here's what the modern engineering stack looks like and where the gaps remain.
Story points, lines of code, and PR count don't measure what matters. Here's what to track instead.
Regressions, slow onboarding, missed estimates, and knowledge loss. Quantifying what poor codebase understanding actually costs.
LeetCode doesn't predict job performance. Codebase navigation and system understanding do. How interviews should evolve for the AI era.
A framework for measuring actual return on AI coding tool investments. Spoiler: adoption rate is the wrong metric.
Before buying AI tools, understand where your team will actually benefit. A practical framework for assessing AI readiness.
AI can flag dependency issues and style violations. Humans should focus on architecture, business logic, and mentoring. Here's how to split the work.
Knowledge concentration is a ticking time bomb. When a key engineer leaves, the blast radius extends far beyond their code.
A quick checklist for evaluating codebase health, team practices, and knowledge risks before accepting an engineering role.
AI-native development isn't about using more AI tools. It's about restructuring workflows around AI strengths and human judgment.