AI-generated dev plans with file-level tasks based on actual codebase architecture. How to cut sprint planning overhead by 50%.
How automated feature discovery and competitive gap analysis accelerate M&A technical evaluation from months to days.
Most AI tool adoptions fail to deliver ROI. Here are the productivity patterns that actually work for engineering teams.
CODEOWNERS files are always stale. Git history tells the truth about who actually maintains, reviews, and understands each part of your codebase.
Most teams measure AI tool success by adoption rate. The right metric is whether hard tickets get easier. Here's the framework that works.
Story points, lines of code, and PR count don't measure what matters. Here's what to track instead.
LeetCode doesn't predict job performance. Codebase navigation and system understanding do. How interviews should evolve for the AI era.
A framework for measuring actual return on AI coding tool investments. Spoiler: adoption rate is the wrong metric.
Before buying AI tools, understand where your team will actually benefit. A practical framework for assessing AI readiness.
Knowledge concentration is a ticking time bomb. When a key engineer leaves, the blast radius extends far beyond their code.
AI-native development isn't about using more AI tools. It's about restructuring workflows around AI strengths and human judgment.